"I have been looking forward to this match, Kuni-san, as your wisdom has been of great help to me in the past, I feel the challenge will be excellent."
He bowed deeply in respect, then got ready for business, his game face descending like a pallid mask.
D7, LM: School Rank/Awareness for Initiative:
6d10o10k5 40
After a moment, the boys were given a passage from the Tao to interpret. Fortunately, it was not one of the dangerous ones that advocated for the undermining of government, but it was an interesting passage nonetheless.
Everyone knows beauty as beauty
because they know ugliness,
knows good as good
by knowing bad.
So it goes: life and death
beget each other, hard
makes easy and vice-versa,
high and low arise by
contrast, long and short
are co-configured, sound
and silence make the music,
before and after follow
from each other.
Therefore the wise practice inaction,
teach without talking about it.
Everything comes to pass
in its time, dynamic
and unauthored, proceeding
despite expectations.
Take what happens
naturally, go on:
no one knows how or why,
it lasts forever.
--
http://mrossman.org/translations/laotzuverses.html
After the judge's recitation, Jiro spoke quietly, with a hint of reverence. "In this passage, the Little Teacher asserts two concepts which at first glance seem unrelated. First, the idea that concepts are defined by their opposites, second that events are unpredictable and lack authorship. The fulcrum is the response to this wisdom the Little Teacher advocates--the wise man is to take no action and somehow to teach without reference to...and this is where the passage becomes most ambiguous..."it," which I take to mean the information contained in the first stanza. The trouble, of course, is that The Little Teacher has chosen to teach (an action) while referring to "it" in most explicit terms. Are we to follow the words of his mouth or his actions? Which is the true lesson?
D7, LM: Courtier/Awareness roll #1, 2 raises called. Tn=30:
10d10o10k5 53 5 persuasion points